Haematologica 2001; 86:E26

[prev] [index] [next]

DMSO and non DMSO clonogenic assays from thawed cord blood

P Solves, L Larrea, MA Soler, V Mirabet, R Moraga, EM Franco
Valencia Cord Blood Bank, Processing and Cryopreservation Service, Valencia Transfusion Center, Spain


Correspondence: Pilar Solves, Valencia Transfusion Centre, Avda del Cid 65-A, 46014 Valencia, Spain. Phone: 00 34 96 386 81 42. Fax: 00 34 96 350 24 69. E-mail: solves_pil@gva.es
medline ref.
Clonogenic assays are currently used to determine in vitro engraftment potential of bone marrow, mobilized peripheral progenitor cells and recently umbilical cord blood.1 The main problem of this test is the lack of standarization as showed by inter-laboratory, intra-laboratory and inter-personal variations.2,3 Commercial kits availability have decreased the variation although it persists.4 Quantification of clonogenic assays is performed in our laboratory after cryopreservation and post-thawing with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). We compared post-thawing umbilical cord blood clonogenic assays with and without DMSO.
Cord blood units were collected, depleted volume and cryopreserved following the method described by Rubinstein et al. For each unit, three satellite cryovials were also cryopreserved. Each cryotube containing frozen cells was placed in a 37ºC water bath and thawed with a gentle agitation. Samples for DMSO assays were drawn from the cryovial and cultured directly in Petri dishes. The rest of cells were washed with albumin and dextran and resuspended in washing solution to remove dimethyl sulfoxide, as described previously.5 Samples from washed cells were drawn for non-DMSO cultures. Clonogenic assays were performed using a commercially prepared complete methylcellulose medium (Methocult GF H4434), supporting growth of CFU-GM, BFU-E and CFU-GEMM. Cultures were plated at a range of 1-4x104 cells in duplicate 35 mm diameter Petri dishes and incubated for 14 days at 37ºC with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. Colonies defined as aggregates of more than 40 cells were counted under an inverted microscope, at the end of incubation period. Colonies were quantified by the same technician to avoid inter-personal variations. Cord blood units total colony forming units were also calculated. Statistical Package for social science (SPSS) v.s 8.0 for Windows was used to perform the statistical analysis. The non-parametric tests Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon were used to compare both groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant (
Table 1).
Thirty-eight samples of cryopreserved cord blood units (CB) were cultured. CB total nucleated and CD34+ cells content mean and range were 7.08x108 (18.66) and 2.59x104 (10.73). Cultured volume median and range were 5.5 (12) and 34.27 (84) for DMSO and non-DMSO cultures respectively (p<0.05). DMSO final concentration median in culture medium was 0.06% (range: 0.13). Wilcoxon test showed statistically differences for all variables except for GEMM x104 (p:0.071). Results are shown on the attached table.
There is no a general agreement about the optimal clonogenic cultures methodology. Many factors like kind of medium (commercial, house-in) and the subjectivity of observer can modify the results.2-4 Because of this variability, clinical significance of this test is not clear and clinicians usually don´t take into account these results for decisions. On the other hand, post-thawing clonogenic assays can serve as quality control of freezing in cryopreservated cord blood units and cells can be cultured with DMSO or after release it by washing. In this sense, culture samples with DMSO simplify the methodology and limit the intra-laboratory variability, by avoiding cells washing. Feasibility of DMSO cultures was confirmed by Broxmeyer et al who showed that the amount of DMSO added to the 1 mL culture dishes were diluted below the concentration that would interfere with the growth of the progenitor cells.6
We conclude that post-thawing DMSO cord blood clonogenic cultures is an easy method useful as quality control of umbilical cord blood cryopreservation. This methodology could also be used for progenitor cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood.

References

  1. Broxmeyer HE, Hangoc G, Cooper S et al. Growth characteristics and expansion of human umbilical cord blood and estimation of its potential for transplantation in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:4109.
  2. Lumley MA, Burton A, Billingham LJ, McDonald DF, Czarnecka HM, Milligan DW. Quality assurance of CFU-GM assays: inter-laboratory variation despite standard reagents. Eur J Haematol 1999;62:32-37.
  3. Lumley MA, Burgess R, Billingham LJ, McDonald DF, Milligan BW. Colony counting is a major source of variation in CFU-GM results between centres. Br J Haematol 1997;97:481-484.
  4. Mossuz P, Dobo I, Genevay MC, Allegraud A, Dautel M, et al. Use of collagen for standardization of PBSC graft quality evaluation: a multicenter comparative analysis of commercial collagen-based and methylcellulose-based colony-forming unit (CFU) assays kits. J Hematother 1998;7:351-9.
  5. Rubinstein P, Dobrila L, Rosenfield RE et al. Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:10119-10122.
  6. Broxmeyer HE, Douglas GW, Hangoc G, Cooper S, Bard J, English D, Arny M, Thomas L, Boyse E. Human umbilical cord blood as a potential source of transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:3828-3832.