Haematologica 2002; 87:(06)ELT29
[
Medline] [prev] [index] [next]

Comment on thalidomide usage in myeloma
B. Myers
Department of Haematology, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, UK.


Corresponding author: Dr. B. Myers, Department of Haematology, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Lenton Boulevard, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. bmyers@hospital-doctor.net
There are increasing concerns over the use of thalidomide in the treatment of myeloma, in particular with regards to its relationship to venous thromboembolism as reported in the
editorial of the April issue of Haematologica. The conclusion was that although thalidomide is of potential benefit in the treatment of myeloma, it should be administered with caution.
We have recently reported on a series of 30 patients receiving thalidomide for up to 22 months (Br J Haematol, 2002, in print). The patientss were all relapsed or refractory to other treatments. The majority received thalidomide alone, and at a low dosage (maximum of 200mg.) because of the older age-group ( median 72 yrs., range 51-90 yrs.), and limited tolerability of higher dosage. In 10 patients, dexamethasone was added to assist response (4 mg. daily reducing over 2-3 months.) With thalidomide alone, 37% of patients had at least a 50% response, with a median duration of 16 months (range 3-22 months). There were a further 7 responses with the addition of dexamethasone, ( median duration 7.5 months, range 3-12 months ), making a total response rate of 63%.
With this modest regime we achieved a significant and durable response for the majority of patients, whilst minimising the toxicity. Three patients (10%), developed venous thromboembolism after a median of 1 year on treatment, two of whom were receiving dexamethasone in addition. The other troublesome side-effect was peripheral neuropathy, which the majority developed in at least a mild form after one year's treatment. However, in this group of refractory patients, often with grossly raised paraprotein levels, a reasonable quality of life was achieved for a median time of 16 months prior to relapse. Whilst we accept that the toxicity of thalidomide is not negligible, especially when used in combination with chemotherapy, it should be considered as a valuable addition to our limited treatment armamentarium in the relapsed setting in this most unpleasant of diseases, while we await the advent of less toxic analogues, and other novel agents.